Loading
Modellsammenligning
Kling 2.6 vs Kling 3 upgrade decision
Kling 2.6 vs Kling 3.0: Velg etter scene, kostnad og stabilitet. Hvis resultatet ikke passer, test en naerliggende modell. Kling 2.6 passer best for Malrettet redigering; Kling 3.0 passer for Raske varianter. Redaksjonelle data gir Kling 2.6 et forsprang pa 0.0 poeng, men budsjett og sceneprioritet bor avgjore valget.
Sist oppdatert: 2026-04-18
Side-by-side specs — brand, pricing, resolution, duration, audio, inputs and aspect ratios.
| Dimensjon | Kling 2.6 | Kling 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Kuaishou | Kuaishou |
| Redaktionel vurdering | 5.0 / 5 | 5.0 / 5 |
| Pricing tier | Gratis nivaa | Gratis nivaa |
| Maksimal oplosning | 1080p | 720p · 1080p |
| Durations supported | 5s · 10s | 3s · 4s · 5s · 6s · 7s · 8s · 9s · 10s · 11s · 12s · 13s · 14s · 15s |
| Innebygd lyd | Unterstuetzt | Unterstuetzt |
| Understottede input | image · text · video | image · text · video |
| Formatforhold | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 | 16:9 · 9:16 · 1:1 |
| Beste scene | Malrettet redigering | Malrettet redigering |
Auto-recommended from spec data — for edge cases, jump back to each model guide for strengths and limitations.
| Ditt behov | Anbefaling |
|---|---|
| I need higher resolution ceiling | Uavgjort |
| I need longer single-clip duration | Kling 3.0 |
| I need native audio, no extra mixing | Both support audio |
| I trust the editorial rating | Uavgjort |
| I want free access, no subscription | Both are free |
The qualitative deltas the spec table cannot show — each model's key strengths and known limitations.
Kling 2.6
Kuaishou AI-modell i ImageToVideoAI workspace
Kling 3.0
Kuaishou AI-modell i ImageToVideoAI workspace